The science on climate change and man's influence on it is far from settled. The question today is whether it makes sense to combat a potential climate threat by imposing economically destructive regulations and sinking billions into failure-prone technologies that have their own environmental costs.Well, WaPo's Eugene Robinson says the debate's over.
Global Warming in U.S. Wildly Overestimated, New Study ShowsI posted Anthony Watts' announcement at my sidebar a week or so ago. Watts Up With That? released a major research paper on Sunday, July 29: "New stud...Read more
Beyond 7 Billion: Global HungerThis is part 3 of the L.A. Times series, "Hunger persists on massive scale":Around the world, population is rising most rapidly in places where life i...Read more
Beyond 7 Billion: The Biggest GenerationThe Los Angeles Times is running a five-part series on global population starting today. The first entry focuses on India, "Fertility rates fall, but ...Read more
Radical Activists Seize on San Onofre in Post-Fukushima Attack on Nuclear Energy ProgramsThis plant has been around as long as I can remember. I've always been personally fascinated with it, and nuclear energy generally, and haven't worrie...Read more
Merchants of DespairBob Zubrin interviewed by Matt Welch, via Blazing Cat Fur:And the book is here: Merchants of Despair: Radical Environmentalists, Criminal Pseudo-Scien...Read more
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Click to see the code!
To insert emoticon you must added at least one space before the code.